On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:00 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 15:57 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Proposal: Chambers II
>> AI: 3
>> II: 1
> Please propose this with an II of at least 2, or you'll get an automatic
> AGAINST from me. Changing the proposal system so radically (or at least,
> moving a lot of things around that will need to be checked for
> loopholes) requires an II of at least 2 in my opinion.

Why should II matter at all?

Reply via email to