On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 19:21 -0400, omd wrote:
> ..off-topic: I wonder if ais523 still takes the position (as e wrote
> in 2897) that CFJ judgements are generally "fraught with danger" of
> "getting the wrong result", i.e. disregarding the meta-rule of
> deferring to judge's interpretations where re
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Just as a note, I think 2895 was a Trial on something unrelated, and scshunt
> supplied gratuitous arguments for 2897, while accidentally calling them
> arguments for 2895. And those arguments got stuck with 2895 in the log. So
> currently, t
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Yah, I'm looking and I haven't found it. So right now it's just a
> > "what I think I remember" thing. FWIW, the logic I remember is that
> > Subject lines are like quotes in replies: they get repeated an
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Yah, I'm looking and I haven't found it. So right now it's just a
> "what I think I remember" thing. FWIW, the logic I remember is that
> Subject lines are like quotes in replies: they get repeated and replied
> to and aren't part of the text
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Edward Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> > > Internet messaging standards (RFC 2822) allow up to 998 characters in
> > > a subject line. Gmail and other web clients usually truncate around
> > > 255. Considering that, is allowing r
G. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
Internet messaging standards (RFC 2822) allow up to 998 characters in
a subject line. Gmail and other web clients usually truncate around
255. Considering that, is allowing report or announcement text in the
subject line a precedent we're
Curiously, rule 2201 §2.1 doesn't use either "publish" or
"announce(ment)", so I'm not sure you actually need to do that in the PF.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
Tttpf
On Monday, July 10, 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
I reject your CoE. The name of the newspaper is clearly
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> Internet messaging standards (RFC 2822) allow up to 998 characters in
> a subject line. Gmail and other web clients usually truncate around
> 255. Considering that, is allowing report or announcement text in the
> subject line a precedent we're ok
In your defense, I figured you were.
In PSS's defense, I wasn't 100% sure.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:34 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
> I was joking don't worry pss
>
>
> On Monday, July 10, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>>
>> Calm down! I don’t think he was the questioning the name, but
I was joking don't worry pss
On Monday, July 10, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Calm down! I don’t think he was the questioning the name, but rather if it
> had a name.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...
Calm down! I don’t think he was the questioning the name, but rather if it had
a name.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:16 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> I reject your CoE. The name of the newspaper is clearly News of Agora.
> Failing
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:29 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> Title: Vij's hip blog, because that's where people get their news from
> man. It's the internet age, man.
>
i am a fan of this
I reject your CoE. The name of the newspaper is clearly News of Agora.
Failing that, the name of the newspaper is the first heading, CuddleBeam
condemned. This is totally discretionary. Dont question my name, dude.
On Monday, July 10, 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 12:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
>> For a moment of levity in these trying times:
>>
>> CoE: The Reportor did not give a suitable name for the newspaper eir
>> report.
>
> Gratuitous: the email's subject line contain
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 12:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> For a moment of levity in these trying times:
>
> CoE: The Reportor did not give a suitable name for the newspaper eir
> report.
Gratuitous: the email's subject line contains a pretty reasonable name
for a newspaper. Can that be consi
For a moment of levity in these trying times:
CoE: The Reportor did not give a suitable name for the newspaper eir report.
Rule 2446:
{The Reportor's weekly report includes:
1. A suitable name for a newspaper, at the Reportor's discretion.}
I interpret this to mean that the name of the newspaper
16 matches
Mail list logo
