In your defense, I figured you were. In PSS's defense, I wasn't 100% sure.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:34 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was joking don't worry pss > > > On Monday, July 10, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> Calm down! I don’t think he was the questioning the name, but rather if it >> had a name. >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> > On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:16 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > I reject your CoE. The name of the newspaper is clearly News of Agora. >> > Failing that, the name of the newspaper is the first heading, CuddleBeam >> > condemned. This is totally discretionary. Dont question my name, dude. >> > >> > On Monday, July 10, 2017, grok (caleb vines) <grokag...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> >> > wrote: >> > > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 12:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: >> > >> For a moment of levity in these trying times: >> > >> >> > >> CoE: The Reportor did not give a suitable name for the newspaper eir >> > >> report. >> > > >> > > Gratuitous: the email's subject line contains a pretty reasonable name >> > > for a newspaper. Can that be considered part of the report? >> > > >> > > -- >> > > ais523 >> > >> > Internet messaging standards (RFC 2822) allow up to 998 characters in >> > a subject line. Gmail and other web clients usually truncate around >> > 255. Considering that, is allowing report or announcement text in the >> > subject line a precedent we're okay with? Is there other precedent to >> > guide us on that subject? (pun DEFINITELY intended) >> > >> > >> > -grok >> >
