I was joking don't worry pss On Monday, July 10, 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Calm down! I don’t think he was the questioning the name, but rather if it > had a name. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > > > > > On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:16 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > I reject your CoE. The name of the newspaper is clearly News of Agora. > Failing that, the name of the newspaper is the first heading, CuddleBeam > condemned. This is totally discretionary. Dont question my name, dude. > > > > On Monday, July 10, 2017, grok (caleb vines) <grokag...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 12:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > >> For a moment of levity in these trying times: > > >> > > >> CoE: The Reportor did not give a suitable name for the newspaper eir > > >> report. > > > > > > Gratuitous: the email's subject line contains a pretty reasonable name > > > for a newspaper. Can that be considered part of the report? > > > > > > -- > > > ais523 > > > > Internet messaging standards (RFC 2822) allow up to 998 characters in > > a subject line. Gmail and other web clients usually truncate around > > 255. Considering that, is allowing report or announcement text in the > > subject line a precedent we're okay with? Is there other precedent to > > guide us on that subject? (pun DEFINITELY intended) > > > > > > -grok > >
