On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Yah, I'm looking and I haven't found it. So right now it's just a > "what I think I remember" thing. FWIW, the logic I remember is that > Subject lines are like quotes in replies: they get repeated and replied > to and aren't part of the textual flow, and we don't want to take every > quote or subject line as a new action, so for them to be paid attention > to you have to add a "TTTTPF" or an "actually, read the subject line" > in the body. > > But I've also found that the precedent that Subject line actions don't > work is woefully lacking in good arguments. It's CFJ 1631, it's cited > by multiple judgements after that, and the sole argument is "because > that's our custom". Unsatisfying!
See CFJs 2895 and 2897, which arguably overruled it.
