Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Unless the Speaker cannot hold that office.
Which R1450 doesn't prevent. R1450 only triggers when the Speaker is
already CotC.
It depends whether you interpret "mutually exclusive" as a prohibition
(with the next clause amounting to "if someone pushes me, I p
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Unless the Speaker cannot hold that office.
Which R1450 doesn't prevent. R1450 only triggers when the Speaker is
already CotC.
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Due to Rules 1006 and 1450, the office of CotC is currently
vacant. Or, under a different interpretation, I am being
continuously assigned by 1006 and removed by 1450, which is
no better.
R1006 says that an office that would otherwise be vacant is held by the
S
On 5/16/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
R889 says
"The Clerk of the Courts ... is an office", but in most other rules
"the Clerk of the Courts" is a player with certain obligations.
At least R1006:
The holder of an office may be referred to by the name of the
office.
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Due to Rules 1006 and 1450, the office of CotC is currently
>vacant. Or, under a different interpretation, I am being
>continuously assigned by 1006 and removed by 1450, which is
>no better.
R1006 says that an office that would otherwise be vacant is held by the
Speaker. This i
comex wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Primo Corporation the holder of
the office of Clerk of the Courts.
I object. IMO partnerships aren't stable enough to hold office yet.
comex wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Primo Corporation the holder of
> the office of Clerk of the Courts.
Heh, splitting officer duties through private arrangement is what
we were trying to acheive through subcontracting a year or so ago,
now here it is, a good idea in through a
Hmmexcellent idea. I support this.
BobTHJ
On 5/15/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/15/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BEWARE... CotC ... office ... it ... is >cough< >cough< ACCURSED
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Primo Corporation the holder of
the office of
BobTHJ wrote:
> Better to have an inexperienced CotC then none at all.
BEWARE... CotC ... office ... it ... is >cough< >cough< ACCURSED
I would offer if I hadn't already offered to take over as Herald. I'm also
probably not the best pick due to my lack of experience. However, if no one
else wishes to step in then I am willing. Better to have an inexperienced
CotC then none at all.
BobTHJ
On 5/15/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Goethe wrote:
I can't keep up right now. Need to enforce a break in myself, otherwise
RL will suffer more (already is, can never seem to not get sucked in).
Sincere apologies for leaving the CotC office so far behind. I'll continue
to watch the (encouraging) developments with interest.
I dere
On May 14, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I can't keep up right now. Need to enforce a break in myself,
otherwise
RL will suffer more (already is, can never seem to not get sucked in).
Sincere apologies for leaving the CotC office so far behind. I'll
continue
to watch the (encoura
12 matches
Mail list logo
