Oops, I was under the impression creating a proposal was an automatic FOR.
Guess not.
Gaelan
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> You didn't vote, so yes?
>
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judici
NttPF
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 8:57 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> I vote PRESENT.
>
> -Aris
>
> > On Jun 6, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant
> > wrote:
> > I hereby
I vote PRESENT.
-Aris
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:57 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I vote PRESENT.
>
> -Aris
>
> > On Jun 6, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant <
>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I hereby distribute ea
You didn't vote, so yes?
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judicial
> proceedings or anything, but it's an amusing bug in the rules if this is
> the case
>
> Gaelan
>
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> On
Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judicial proceedings
or anything, but it's an amusing bug in the rules if this is the case
Gaelan
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant
>> wrote:
>> I hereby distribute each lis
Even though it wasn't set then, it would've been set to that [Along with
the Elections started by nichdel that I still need to resolve]
I'm going to just assume Quorum is 4 for these decisions as there's no
reason to act otherwise.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:07 PM Quazie wrote:
> nttpf.
>
> And Q
nttpf.
And Quorum, by the rules right now, for this proposal, would be 4 as that's
the reflection of the Assessor's resolution of proposals on the 24th of May
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:05 PM Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 23:55 +, Quazie wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 23:55 +, Quazie wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> > pool. For
9 matches
Mail list logo
