Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
>> It is reasonable to expect a small modicum of effort by the judge,
>> such as reading messages sent to the discussion forum on the same day.
>
> You have to understand: when I joined this game (you can see this when
> you look back at the
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Alex Smith wrote:
>> e can report Myndzi's playership
>> as disputed, but continuing for ages with unknown registration statuses
>> could really be damaging to Agora (c.f. Annabel, but probably not quite
>> as bad unless Myndzi starts taking actions).
>>
> E
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:50 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The problem on putting the onus on the CFJ caller, here, is that e may
> not be the best person to know the information. If the caller responds,
> effectively, "go on, then, continue playing with unkno
Alex Smith wrote:
> Part of the serious problem in this case is that there isn't a whole lot
> of information around as-is; in particular, I'm not entirely sure if
> there's enough information to produce a judgement, although there may
> be. Even more interesting, the playership of a player is up f
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:50 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Gratuitous arguments for the appeal:
> In this case, from the Caller's Evidence, there's no record of what
> happened, no reference to the event that may have made Myndzi a
> player, and no reference for the judge to look it up. Only an obs
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:40 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM,
> > C-walker wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >>> == CFJ 2586 ==
> >>>
> >>>Myndzi is
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM,
> C-walker wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> == CFJ 2586 ==
>>>
>>>Myndzi is a player.
>>
>> I judge UNDETERMINED due to complete lack of evidence. T
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Oh but wait, that means the Caller has to expend some effort instead
> of the CotC, a full appeals court, and the judges? How un-Agoran!
It is reasonable to expect a small modicum of effort by the judge,
such as reading messages sent to the di
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> C-walker wrote:
>> I judge UNDETERMINED due to complete lack of evidence. This is clearly
>> not decidable based on the Caller's Evidence below, and as per CFJ
>> 1744 it is not my job to go finding the relevant evidence in the
>> archives.
>
> I intend
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM,
> C-walker wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> == CFJ 2586 ==
>>>
>>>Myndzi is a player.
>> I judge UNDETERMINED due to complete lack of evidence. This
10 matches
Mail list logo