On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > C-walker<charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> I judge UNDETERMINED due to complete lack of evidence. This is clearly >> not decidable based on the Caller's Evidence below, and as per CFJ >> 1744 it is not my job to go finding the relevant evidence in the >> archives. > > I intend with 2 support to appeal this judgment. The only relevant > evidence was quoted in my initiation message, and all of the > discussion concerning the case happened in the past day. It's not > like delving deep into the archives is required. It's also definitely > not in the best interests of the game to leave person's citizenship > undetermined.
Or you could just, you know, be nice, accept that there wasn't enough information when the case was called, present the information over the past day in a concise form, and call a new case. You'd get an answer much faster. Oh but wait, that means the Caller has to expend some effort instead of the CotC, a full appeals court, and the judges? How un-Agoran! -G.
