Zefram wrote:
Peekee wrote:
I believe accountants(?) etc. use that rounding fairly often.
No. Bankers' rounding is nearest-or-even. That's also the usual mode
for binary floating point arithmetic.
The proto's method is a variation of bankers' rounding; I didn't
want 0.5 to be rounded to 0
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
guess he is just being quirky then.
Peekee wrote:
I believe accountants(?) etc. use that rounding fairly often.
No. Bankers' rounding is nearest-or-even. That's also the usual mode
for binary floating point arithmetic.
-zefram
--
Peekee
Peekee wrote:
>I believe accountants(?) etc. use that rounding fairly often.
No. Bankers' rounding is nearest-or-even. That's also the usual mode
for binary floating point arithmetic.
-zefram
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ed Murphy wrote:
a) When a proposal is adopted, its proposer gains Red VCs
Ordinary, Interested, and only once per week please.
which any fractional voting limits are rounded to the nearest
integer (nearest odd integer if the fractional p
Ed Murphy wrote:
>a) When a proposal is adopted, its proposer gains Red VCs
Ordinary, Interested, and only once per week please.
> which any fractional voting limits are rounded to the nearest
> integer (nearest odd integer if the fractional part is 0.5).
Never seen this roundi
Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"then e loses loses a VC"
Proto-Proposal: Three-Tone Economics
(AI = 3, please)
Change the Power of Rule 2126 (Voting Credits) to 2, and amend it
to read:
Voting Credits (VCs) are a measure of each player's ability to
affect voting limits o
6 matches
Mail list logo
