Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Sgeo wrote: > >> How do you easily differntiate from "Agora is not a nomic because >> nothing can remove the right to deregister" and "Agora is not a nomic >> because it's horribly broken and literally unplayable"? > > There's a big difference be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

Sgeo wrote: > How do you easily differntiate from "Agora is not a nomic because > nothing can remove the right to deregister" and "Agora is not a nomic > because it's horribly broken and literally unplayable"? There's a big difference between "nothing can remove" and "nothing at Power < 3 can rem

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Feb 18, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 18:20 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote: "... always dance a powerful dance." But are /you/ a Marvy? [See also CFJ 1881.] -- ais523 I was once. I'd have to dig through a-b archives to find out when. - Benjamin Schultz KE

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 18:20 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote: > "... always dance a powerful dance." But are /you/ a Marvy? [See also CFJ 1881.] -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Feb 18, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 16:21 -0600, Aaron Goldfein wrote: Nevertheless, some new rule could be passed which violates the rights, which should, above all, be held as the most important. It seems foolish to have a power 4 designation and not use it

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 16:21 -0600, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Nevertheless, some new rule could be passed which violates the rights, > which should, above all, be held as the most important. It seems > foolish to have a power 4 designation and not use it for the most > fundamentally important rule. N

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 17:15 -0500, Warrigal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4) > > > > Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 to power > > 4. > > AI = 3 is sufficient, as power-3 instruments are

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Sgeo wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

2009/2/18 Aaron Goldfein : > I think what's most important of all is specifically the right to > deregister. It would be horribly bad if we as players were trapped in this > game forever. And also, Agora need not be a nomic to continue being a game. If Agora ever stopped being a nomic, I think its

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I think what's most important of all is specifically the right to > deregister. It would be horribly bad if we as players were trapped in this > game forever. I declare "It's A Trap Nomic" to be officially open. See rules 104 and 113. 'Imm

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

Yally wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein > mailto:aarongoldf...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4) > > > > Increase the power of Rule 101 (The

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Sgeo wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal > > > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein < > aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Proposal: Protec

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein >> wrote: >> > Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4) >> > >> > Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 t

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal > wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4) > > > > Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 to > power > > 4. > > > > -Yally > > AI = 3 is sufficient, as power-

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Protect Our Rights

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4) > > Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 to power > 4. > > -Yally AI = 3 is sufficient, as power-3 instruments are unrestricted. --Warrigal