On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal <ihope12...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4)
>> >
>> > Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 to
>> > power
>> > 4.
>> >
>> > -Yally
>>
>> AI = 3 is sufficient, as power-3 instruments are unrestricted.
>>
>> --Warrigal
>
> Nevertheless, some new rule could be passed which violates the rights, which
> should, above all, be held as the most important. It seems foolish to have a
> power 4 designation and not use it for the most fundamentally important
> rule.
>
> -Yally
>
I think perhaps the rule protecting Agora's nomicness may in fact be
more important. Would you rather have a game but not have rights in
the game, or a dead game?
