On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Sgeo <sgeos...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal > > <ihope12...@gmail.com<ihope127%...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein < > aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4) > >> > > >> > Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 to > >> > power > >> > 4. > >> > > >> > -Yally > >> > >> AI = 3 is sufficient, as power-3 instruments are unrestricted. > >> > >> --Warrigal > > > > Nevertheless, some new rule could be passed which violates the rights, > which > > should, above all, be held as the most important. It seems foolish to > have a > > power 4 designation and not use it for the most fundamentally important > > rule. > > > > -Yally > > > I think perhaps the rule protecting Agora's nomicness may in fact be > more important. Would you rather have a game but not have rights in > the game, or a dead game?
I think what's most important of all is specifically the right to deregister. It would be horribly bad if we as players were trapped in this game forever. And also, Agora need not be a nomic to continue being a game.
