Re: DIS: Re: BUS: More Betterer Pledges

2017-06-24 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Jun 24, 2017, at 6:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > A pledge MAY be considered broken if the pledgor does > > > Using MAY here is grammatically odd to me. Do you mean "might"? > Or do you mean (

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: More Betterer Pledges

2017-06-24 Thread Owen Jacobson
On Jun 24, 2017, at 6:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> A pledge MAY be considered broken if the pledgor does > > Using MAY here is grammatically odd to me. Do you mean "might"? > Or do you mean (using the definition of MAY) that it is not against > the r

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: More Betterer Pledges

2017-06-24 Thread omd
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> A pledge MAY be considered broken if the pledgor does > > Using MAY here is grammatically odd to me. Do you mean "might"? > Or do you mean (using the definition of MAY) that it is not against > th

DIS: Re: BUS: More Betterer Pledges

2017-06-24 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 24 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > A pledge MAY be considered broken if the pledgor does Using MAY here is grammatically odd to me. Do you mean "might"? Or do you mean (using the definition of MAY) that it is not against the rules to "perform the action" of considering the pledge