On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> A pledge MAY be considered broken if the pledgor does > > Using MAY here is grammatically odd to me. Do you mean "might"? > Or do you mean (using the definition of MAY) that it is not against > the rules to "perform the action" of considering the pledge to be > broken, whatever that means?
Under past rules, that would have implied that it's illegal to consider a pledge broken in other circumstances - thoughtcrime :)
