I submit, m'lud, that the fact that my learned opponent believed the
concept of "intent" was in the previous rule version shows that "attempt",
in a natural sense, coveys the sense of intent in the (unremoved) text.
On 6/18/2020 8:51 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> never mind, cant rea
never mind, cant read. rest of argument still stands on ordinary meaning of
attempt in a criminal context. new common sense arguments: rules tend to
think intending anything you want is okay and criminalizing formal intent
is bad, see the No Faking rule (exempting intent)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1
On 6/18/2020 8:02 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> Merely thinking and planning to commit murder isn't attempted murder, the
> acts carried out have to be "more than merely preparatory" (under English
> law). The same applies to this analogous crime, merely preparing to take
> the ossify
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:52 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> CFJ: R. Lee attempted to perform a forbidden action in the message in
> evidence.
>
> Barred: R. Lee
>
> Arguments:
>
> In reference to:
> Attempting a forbidden action is PROHIBITED,
Lol, I just amended the forbidden arts rule to allow me to do this, so nice
try. It would require me to actually do the action (or attempt it) which I
can't do due to the objection.
I didn't have any overarching objective with this message lol it was mainly
a Beaker joke.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at
On 6/18/20 8:50 PM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to amed the rules in the following
> inconsequential way:
> Amend every word in the ruleset except the rules at power 4 to read "Meep"
>
> --
> From R. Lee
I don't think words can read.
--
nch
Prime Minister, W
6 matches
Mail list logo
