Cuddlebeam wrote:
(once you have a totally reliable majority cabal, the game is under your
total control anyways, you just monopolize what proposals pass and what not)
Provided that it remains totally reliable, because backstabbing never
ever happens.
Maybe it would lead to less degenerate ga
(once you have a totally reliable majority cabal, the game is under your
total control anyways, you just monopolize what proposals pass and what not)
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:18 PM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> It's not guaranteed if another group does the random roll instead and the
> bonds of a majorit
It's not guaranteed if another group does the random roll instead and the
bonds of a majority cabal aren't strong enough. Although once you have a
totally reliable cabal that is majority-sized, then yes, it's better to go
for your option.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:14 PM nix via agora-discussion <
a
On 9/2/20 11:10 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Having a sole winner doesn't solve the problem imo, you could just
> make that one of the team players selected at random achieve a win
> (which is quicker than the 2-proposal one and if done, it's too fast
> for anything slower to work).
Quicker in lega
Having a sole winner doesn't solve the problem imo, you could just make
that one of the team players selected at random achieve a win (which is
quicker than the 2-proposal one and if done, it's too fast for anything
slower to work).
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:07 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-d
On 9/2/20 9:51 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> OK, so here's what's going on: I received a proposal along the lines of
> "these players get 100 points. They all win." I won't reveal the names or
> number of these players for obvious reasons, but, at the point when it
> happene
> On Sep 2, 2020, at 3:51 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> OK, so here's what's going on: I received a proposal along the lines of
> "these players get 100 points. They all win." I won't reveal the names or
> number of these players for obvious reasons, but, at the point
OK, so here's what's going on: I received a proposal along the lines of "these
players get 100 points. They all win." I won't reveal the names or number of
these players for obvious reasons, but, at the point when it happened, it was
exactly enough players to pass a proposal… as long as Cuddlebe
On 9/1/20 2:51 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> I become a player in Nomaoic. Noting that I'm very open to cabals, feel
> free to email me.
This was NttPF btw.
--
Jason Cobb
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 7:33 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 9/1/20 7:26 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > On 9/1/20 2:17 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> >> I do so.
> >>
> >> Players may register by a public message; after that, the
I become a player in Nomaoic. Noting that I'm very open to cabals, feel
free to email me.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:25 PM ATMunn via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 9/1/2020 2:17 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Aug 28, 2020, at 6:22 PM, Gaela
On 8/28/2020 10:22 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
I intend, with 2 Consent, to initiate a free tournament with the following
regulations.
1. Gaelan can not win the Tournament, nor become a player within the
tournament. Gaelan is the Gamemaster and Judge of this Tournament.
2. Thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
