(once you have a totally reliable majority cabal, the game is under your total control anyways, you just monopolize what proposals pass and what not)
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:18 PM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's not guaranteed if another group does the random roll instead and the > bonds of a majority cabal aren't strong enough. Although once you have a > totally reliable cabal that is majority-sized, then yes, it's better to go > for your option. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:14 PM nix via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> On 9/2/20 11:10 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> > Having a sole winner doesn't solve the problem imo, you could just >> > make that one of the team players selected at random achieve a win >> > (which is quicker than the 2-proposal one and if done, it's too fast >> > for anything slower to work). >> >> Quicker in legal mechanics but sounds a lot more difficult to convince >> people of. I don't think I'd join a 1 in 4 chance if I was also offered >> a slightly slower but guaranteed win. >> >> -- >> nix >> Prime Minister, Webmastor >> >> >>
