Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] R2478 Fix

2019-10-20 Thread Jason Cobb
On 10/20/19 1:36 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: Currently, this sort of penalty is allowed for the Cold Hand of Justice, but not for Summary Judgement. That seems like an error to me. I'd be tempted to repeal the mandate entirely Yeah, that's my fault. I changed "person who plays the game" to "player

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] R2478 Fix

2019-10-20 Thread James Cook
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 05:37, Aris Merchant wrote: > Currently, this sort of penalty is allowed for the Cold Hand of > Justice, but not for Summary Judgement. That seems like an error to > me. I'd be tempted to repeal the mandate entirely, but a) allowing > non-players to join contracts is potenti

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] R2478 Fix

2019-10-19 Thread Aris Merchant
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:19 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On 10/18/2019 1:11 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > I submit the following proposal: > > > > Title: R2478 Fix > > > > AI: 1.7 > > > > Text: > > > > { > > > > Amend Rule 2478 ("Vigilante Justice") by replacing the text "a person (the > > perp) who p

DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] R2478 Fix

2019-10-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 10/18/2019 1:11 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: I submit the following proposal: Title: R2478 Fix AI: 1.7 Text: { Amend Rule 2478 ("Vigilante Justice") by replacing the text "a person (the perp) who plays the game" with the text "a player (the perp)". } The purpose of that clause is that, a

DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] R2478 Fix

2019-10-18 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
On Friday, October 18, 2019 8:11 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > I submit the following proposal: > > Title: R2478 Fix > > AI: 1.7 > > Text: > > { > > Amend Rule 2478 ("Vigilante Justice") by replacing the text "a person > (the perp) who plays the game" with the text "a player (the perp)". > > } > > -- >