On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 05:37, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently, this sort of penalty is allowed for the Cold Hand of > Justice, but not for Summary Judgement. That seems like an error to > me. I'd be tempted to repeal the mandate entirely, but a) allowing > non-players to join contracts is potentially fun; and, more > importantly, b) the rules are still vulnerable to abuse by > non-players in the same way they were back then. I also think the > phrase "person who plays the game" seems messy and unnecessarily > confusing (pretty characteristic of my writing in general, especially > back then). > > I'd unify the Cold Hand of Justice and Summary Judgement > on allowing the punishment of persons, on the grounds that a person > who isn't involved with the game is unlikely to commit a rules > violation. Alternatively, we could go the other direction, banning > non-players from joining contracts but making them immune to > prosecutions. The current state of affairs is definitely not great, > and I'd like to thank Jason Cobb for bringing up the issue. > > [1] > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2017-September/044934.html > > > -Aris
With the adoption of Proposal 8250 (Finger Bending), I think the Referee is no longer banned from pointing eir finger. Do we still need summary judgement? -- - Falsifian
