Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

2017-05-30 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
That is the change I have made. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Quazie wrote: > Suggestion: > > For the agency the responsible person is the head. For an organization the > responsible person is either defined by the organization, or the player > with the h

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

2017-05-30 Thread Quazie
Suggestion: For the agency the responsible person is the head. For an organization the responsible person is either defined by the organization, or the player with the highest budget switch if not defined. On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 03:15 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@go

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

2017-05-30 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I like this revision because it seems to have closed the loopholes of the last one. However, one issue I see is if the member of the Organization leaves, it is unclear what occurs. For your ease, I have compiled my suggested revisions below: Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

2017-05-29 Thread Gaelan Steele
I retract “State of the Union." I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union v2” by Gaelan, PSS and Aris: < Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: { An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter)

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

2017-05-28 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union” by Gaelan: < > > Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: { > > An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the > Agency or Organization’s text (P

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

2017-05-28 Thread Gaelan Steele
I mean, you can just ratify anything without objection. This doesn't really create a new avenue for going around formal procedure. Gaelan > On May 28, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > I don’t like that it is self-ratifying because that would allow bypassing >

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] State of the Union

2017-05-28 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I don’t like that it is self-ratifying because that would allow bypassing formalized procedures. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On May 28, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’