I like this revision because it seems to have closed the loopholes of the last
one. However, one issue I see is if the member of the Organization leaves, it
is unclear what occurs. For your ease, I have compiled my suggested revisions
below:
Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the
Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules. An
Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its Internal
State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report describing that
part of the state. If an organization or agency’s text states that it wishes to
use self-ratifying reports, then portions of the report that describe this
state are self-ratifying.
The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s Head. An
Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as the
Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can destroy an
organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
If the member leaves the organization, any member may publish the report and
the player with the highest budget switch SHALL do so in a timely manner.
}
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On May 30, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>
> OK, this is plain embarrassing.
>
> I retract “State of the Union."
>
> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union v2” by Gaelan, PSS and
> Aris: <
> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the
> Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules. An
> Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its Internal
> State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report describing that
> state. If an organization or agency’s text states that it wishes to use
> self-ratifying reports, then portions of the report that describe this state
> are self-ratifying.
> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s Head. An
> Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as the
> Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can destroy an
> organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
> }
> >
>
> Gaelan
>
>> On May 29, 2017, at 11:46 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>>
>> I retract “State of the Union."
>>
>> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union v2” by Gaelan, PSS and
>> Aris: <
>> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
>> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the
>> Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules. An
>> Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
>> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
>> describing that state. If an organization or agency’s text states that it
>> wishes to use self-ratifying reports, then portions of the report that
>> describe this state are self-ratifying.
>> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s Head.
>> An Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as the
>> Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can destroy an
>> organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
>> }
>> >
>>
>> Gaelan
>>> On May 28, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Aris Merchant
>>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>>>> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union” by Gaelan: <
>>>>
>>>> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
>>>>
>>>> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the
>>>> Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules.
>>>>
>>>> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
>>>> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
>>>> describing that state. The portion of such a report that describes this
>>>> state is self-ratifying.
>>>>
>>>> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s Head.
>>>> An Organization’s Charter must define a Responsible Player for all of its
>>>> state; any player can destroy an organization which does not do so with 1
>>>> week Notice.
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a half-proto; I’ll retract it if changes are required or pend it if
>>>> they are not.
>>>
>>> Several problems. The worst one that you're imposing obligations on a
>>> person who need not be a member of the organization. I'd also suggest
>>> making the self-ratifying bit optional, although I can see arguments
>>> for and against that.
>>>
>>> -Aris
>>
>
