That is the change I have made.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Suggestion:
>
> For the agency the responsible person is the head. For an organization the
> responsible person is either defined by the organization, or the player
> with the highest budget switch if not defined.
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 03:15 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I like this revision because it seems to have closed the loopholes of the
>> last one. However, one issue I see is if the member of the Organization
>> leaves, it is unclear what occurs. For your ease, I have compiled my
>> suggested revisions below:
>>
>> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
>> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by
>> the Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules.
>> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
>> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
>> describing that part of the state. If an organization or agency’s text
>> states that it wishes to use self-ratifying reports, then portions of the
>> report that describe this state are self-ratifying.
>> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s
>> Head. An Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as
>> the Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can
>> destroy an organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
>> If the member leaves the organization, any member may publish the report
>> and the player with the highest budget switch SHALL do so in a timely
>> manner.
>> }
>> ----
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> > On May 30, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > OK, this is plain embarrassing.
>> >
>> > I retract “State of the Union."
>> >
>> > I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union v2” by Gaelan, PSS
>> and Aris: <
>> > Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
>> > An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by
>> the Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules.
>> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
>> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
>> describing that state. If an organization or agency’s text states that it
>> wishes to use self-ratifying reports, then portions of the report that
>> describe this state are self-ratifying.
>> > The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s
>> Head. An Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as
>> the Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can
>> destroy an organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
>> > }
>> > >
>> >
>> > Gaelan
>> >
>> >> On May 29, 2017, at 11:46 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I retract “State of the Union."
>> >>
>> >> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union v2” by Gaelan, PSS
>> and Aris: <
>> >> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
>> >> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by
>> the Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules.
>> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
>> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
>> describing that state. If an organization or agency’s text states that it
>> wishes to use self-ratifying reports, then portions of the report that
>> describe this state are self-ratifying.
>> >> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s
>> Head. An Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as
>> the Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can
>> destroy an organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
>> >> }
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Gaelan
>> >>> On May 28, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@
>> gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union” by Gaelan: <
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
>> >>>>
>> >>>> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined
>> by the
>> >>>> Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any
>> rules.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of
>> its
>> >>>> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
>> >>>> describing that state. The portion of such a report that describes
>> this
>> >>>> state is self-ratifying.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s
>> Head.
>> >>>> An Organization’s Charter must define a Responsible Player for all
>> of its
>> >>>> state; any player can destroy an organization which does not do so
>> with 1
>> >>>> week Notice.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> }
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is a half-proto; I’ll retract it if changes are required or
>> pend it if
>> >>>> they are not.
>> >>>
>> >>> Several problems. The worst one that you're imposing obligations on a
>> >>> person who need not be a member of the organization. I'd also suggest
>> >>> making the self-ratifying bit optional, although I can see arguments
>> >>> for and against that.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Aris
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
