Suggestion:
For the agency the responsible person is the head. For an organization the
responsible person is either defined by the organization, or the player
with the highest budget switch if not defined.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 03:15 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I like this revision because it seems to have closed the loopholes of the
> last one. However, one issue I see is if the member of the Organization
> leaves, it is unclear what occurs. For your ease, I have compiled my
> suggested revisions below:
>
> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the
> Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules. An
> Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
> describing that part of the state. If an organization or agency’s text
> states that it wishes to use self-ratifying reports, then portions of the
> report that describe this state are self-ratifying.
> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s Head.
> An Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as the
> Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can destroy an
> organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
> If the member leaves the organization, any member may publish the report
> and the player with the highest budget switch SHALL do so in a timely
> manner.
> }
> ----
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On May 30, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, this is plain embarrassing.
> >
> > I retract “State of the Union."
> >
> > I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union v2” by Gaelan, PSS and
> Aris: <
> > Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
> > An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by
> the Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules.
> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
> describing that state. If an organization or agency’s text states that it
> wishes to use self-ratifying reports, then portions of the report that
> describe this state are self-ratifying.
> > The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s
> Head. An Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as
> the Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can
> destroy an organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
> > }
> > >
> >
> > Gaelan
> >
> >> On May 29, 2017, at 11:46 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I retract “State of the Union."
> >>
> >> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union v2” by Gaelan, PSS
> and Aris: <
> >> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
> >> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by
> the Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules.
> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
> describing that state. If an organization or agency’s text states that it
> wishes to use self-ratifying reports, then portions of the report that
> describe this state are self-ratifying.
> >> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s
> Head. An Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as
> the Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can
> destroy an organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
> >> }
> >> >
> >>
> >> Gaelan
> >>> On May 28, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union” by Gaelan: <
> >>>>
> >>>> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
> >>>>
> >>>> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined
> by the
> >>>> Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any
> rules.
> >>>>
> >>>> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of
> its
> >>>> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
> >>>> describing that state. The portion of such a report that describes
> this
> >>>> state is self-ratifying.
> >>>>
> >>>> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s
> Head.
> >>>> An Organization’s Charter must define a Responsible Player for all of
> its
> >>>> state; any player can destroy an organization which does not do so
> with 1
> >>>> week Notice.
> >>>>
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a half-proto; I’ll retract it if changes are required or pend
> it if
> >>>> they are not.
> >>>
> >>> Several problems. The worst one that you're imposing obligations on a
> >>> person who need not be a member of the organization. I'd also suggest
> >>> making the self-ratifying bit optional, although I can see arguments
> >>> for and against that.
> >>>
> >>> -Aris
> >>
> >
>
>
