On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This feels clunky. What are we trying to accomplish here? Prevent
>> people from claiming to take actions that they know they can't take?
>
> Yes. Give me one good reason why that should be allowed.
I'm not arguing for it to
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Monday 14 July 2008 11:02:04 am Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
>>> On Sunday 13 July 2008 11:43:28 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
A public claim intended to mislead others (whether directly
or indirectly) regarding one'
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Sgeo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As an Officer, I've been forced by one Rule's asap to attempt to perform
>> actions that I knew for a fact (due to another rule) would fail. -goethe
>>
> Details for the curious pleas
On Monday 14 July 2008 11:02:04 am Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 July 2008 11:43:28 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> A public claim intended to mislead others (whether directly
> >> or indirectly) regarding one's identity constitutes a false
> >> stateme
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Taral wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
c) A public statement that one performs an action is true if
and
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Taral wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>c) A public statement that one performs an action is true if
>>> and only if one succeeds in performing that action by
>>> making that publ
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Sunday 13 July 2008 11:43:28 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
>> A public claim intended to mislead others (whether directly or
>> indirectly) regarding one's identity constitutes a false
>> statement, and SHOULD be severely punished.
>
> A person S
On Monday 14 July 2008 04:12:48 am Taral wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >c) A public statement that one performs an action is true
> > if and only if one succeeds in performing that action by making
> > that public statement, but violates t
Taral wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>c) A public statement that one performs an action is true if
>> and only if one succeeds in performing that action by
>> making that public statement, but violates this rule only
>>
On Sunday 13 July 2008 11:43:28 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
> A public claim intended to mislead others (whether directly or
> indirectly) regarding one's identity constitutes a false
> statement, and SHOULD be severely punished.
A person SHALL NOT make a public claim intended to mislead
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>c) A public statement that one performs an action is true if
> and only if one succeeds in performing that action by
> making that public statement, but violates this rule only
> if one beli
Proto-Proposal: But what is truth?
(AI = 2, please)
Zefram and Michael are co-authors of this proposal.
Change the power of Rule 2149 (Truthfulness) to 2, and amend it to read:
A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e reasonably
believes it is true, or else provides a rea
12 matches
Mail list logo
