On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Taral wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> c) A public statement that one performs an action is true if
>>>> and only if one succeeds in performing that action by
>>>> making that public statement, but violates this rule only
>>>> if one believes it will definitely fail.
>>>
>>> This feels clunky. What are we trying to accomplish here? Prevent
>>> people from claiming to take actions that they know they can't take?
>>
>> Yes. Give me one good reason why that should be allowed.
>
> As an Officer, I've been forced by one Rule's asap to attempt to perform
> actions that I knew for a fact (due to another rule) would fail. -goethe
>
Details for the curious please?
