On Monday 14 July 2008 11:02:04 am Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote: > > On Sunday 13 July 2008 11:43:28 pm Ed Murphy wrote: > >> A public claim intended to mislead others (whether directly > >> or indirectly) regarding one's identity constitutes a false > >> statement, and SHOULD be severely punished. > > > > A person SHALL NOT make a public claim intended to mislead others, > > either directly or indirectly, regarding eir identity. > > > > [Less clunky, and allows infractions to be punished against a > > power-3 rule rather than a power-1 one.] > > Do you mean that any Rule containing a SHALL NOT can be punished at > power-3 because it violates MMI? Has that interpretation been > tested?
No, R2170 (into which the paragraph in question is protoproposed to be inserted) is power-3.
