On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote: > On Sunday 13 July 2008 11:43:28 pm Ed Murphy wrote: >> A public claim intended to mislead others (whether directly or >> indirectly) regarding one's identity constitutes a false >> statement, and SHOULD be severely punished. > > A person SHALL NOT make a public claim intended to mislead others, > either directly or indirectly, regarding eir identity. > > [Less clunky, and allows infractions to be punished against a power-3 > rule rather than a power-1 one.]
Do you mean that any Rule containing a SHALL NOT can be punished at power-3 because it violates MMI? Has that interpretation been tested? -Goethe
