You might even want to roll the preserved land fix into this. That's
technically not a bug, but it's a big enough malfunction that I don't
think it would be unreasonable to put it in the same proposal.
-Aris
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I also don't think you fixed the
I also don't think you fixed the contract upkeep cost bug.
-Aris
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> I create the following proposal; keeping it in the Pool in case of final
>> feedback.
>>
>> Title: PAoaM Patch
>> AI:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I create the following proposal; keeping it in the Pool in case of final
> feedback.
>
> Title: PAoaM Patch
> AI: 3
> Authors: Gaelan, Trigon
>
> —
> In Rule 105 “Rule Changes,” replace "If the reenacting proposal provides new
> text for the
Other things we need to do:
Make Agora the auctioneer for Land Auctions.
Remove the last paragraph of the Facilities rule and replace it with
"Facilities always have the same owner as their parent land unit" or
smth.
Add a destruction clause to the Facilities rule. Also maybe a
rank-down the fac
This doesn’t need to be 3.1, just 3. Oops.
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 7:19 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> Title: PAoaM Patch
> AI: 3.1
>
> —
>
> Remove the sentence "If the reenacting proposal provides new text for the
> rule, the rule must have materially the same purpose as did the
> repealed versi
Title: PAoaM Patch
AI: 3.1
—
Remove the sentence "If the reenacting proposal provides new text for the
rule, the rule must have materially the same purpose as did the
repealed version; otherwise, the attempt to reenact the rule is
null and void.” from Rule 105 “Rule Changes.”
If rule 2599 is not
6 matches
Mail list logo
