On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:17 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
root wrote:
> WATCHERS (24)
> //BethMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 30 Jun 1993
The significance of // should be explained.
Beats me. I just inherited it that way from the previous Registrar.
I think an e-mail to them bounced at
On 8/31/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
> >Upon passage of this proposal the Registrar shall as soon as possible
>
> It's doubtful that this would have the effect that you intend. We've
> had this debate before; I'll just point back to the first instance,
> proposal 861,
Roger Hicks wrote:
>Upon passage of this proposal the Registrar shall as soon as possible
It's doubtful that this would have the effect that you intend. We've
had this debate before; I'll just point back to the first instance,
proposal 861, which claimed to be a foreign policy directive but also
On 8/31/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root wrote:
>
> >> > PLAYERS (16-18)
> >>
> >> > ACTIVITY LEVEL
> >>
> >> Can these lists be combined, please?
> >
> > I've considered doing that before, but I haven't found a way to do it
> > within 70 columns such that I'm happy with the legibi
root wrote:
> PLAYERS (16-18)
> ACTIVITY LEVEL
Can these lists be combined, please?
I've considered doing that before, but I haven't found a way to do it
within 70 columns such that I'm happy with the legibility.
How about this?
Nickname E-mail address Registered
On 8/30/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > EVENT HISTORY
>
> This could be trimmed back to the last month or two.
Yes, it could. I think perhaps I'll try to keep it around a page.
> > PLAYERS (16-18)
>
> > ACTIVITY LEVEL
>
> Can these lists be combined, please?
I've considered doin
> Here and Gone Again: a Registrar's Report
> EVENT HISTORY
This could be trimmed back to the last month or two.
> PLAYERS (16-18)
> ACTIVITY LEVEL
Can these lists be combined, please?
> WATCHERS (24)
> //BethMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 30 Jun 1993
The significance of // sh
7 matches
Mail list logo
