On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:17 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:

root wrote:

 > WATCHERS (24)

 > //BethMo          [EMAIL PROTECTED]               30 Jun 1993

The significance of // should be explained.
Beats me.  I just inherited it that way from the previous Registrar.

I think an e-mail to them bounced at some point.  *pokes through the
archives*  Ah yes, on 30 Jul 05, then-Register OscarMeyr mass-invited
the watchers to register; the ones marked // bounced at that time.

Yep, that's it. There was a consensus to leave the unreachable Watchers on the list, so I simply commented out the listings of the bouncing email addresses.
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr


Reply via email to