Murphy wrote:
> Rule 478 has only defined "by announcement" since February 2003, when
> it was quietly introduced as a side effect of Proposal 4456 (which
> introduced Switches for the first time, and defined one for fora).
Historical note: This was a result of Maud's concerns expressed in
CFJ
root wrote:
On 11/1/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Zefram wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
When Agoran Rules allow an action to be conducted "by announcement",
the specific announcement is the action in question, giving the
appearance that we support ISIDTID. In reality, we are recognizi
On 11/1/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zefram wrote:
>
> > Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >> When Agoran Rules allow an action to be conducted "by announcement",
> >> the specific announcement is the action in question, giving the
> >> appearance that we support ISIDTID. In reality, we are rec
Zefram wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
When Agoran Rules allow an action to be conducted "by announcement",
the specific announcement is the action in question, giving the
appearance that we support ISIDTID. In reality, we are recognizing
the actual act of posting a message as the action.
Yes.
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Zefram wrote:
> comex wrote:
> >By the way, although I'm not going to try to perl 10,000 CFJs, I see
> >no reason not to try to scam this before the loophole is closed (with
> >Proposal 5284 or such) with, say, 100.
>
> Actually 100 has been done before, written out in
comex wrote:
>By the way, although I'm not going to try to perl 10,000 CFJs, I see
>no reason not to try to scam this before the loophole is closed (with
>Proposal 5284 or such) with, say, 100.
Actually 100 has been done before, written out in full. Also, the voting
period on P5284 will end befor
On 11/1/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that requiring the scammer to repeat the message 10,000
> times is not that much of a technical or time effort; eg. 5 minutes
> and a perl script. It does present a cultural/social barrier
> which is a de facto effort to break. We recognize
Oh, I just remembered another precedent which supports part of your
analysis: some years ago KoJen posted an announcement along the lines of
"I hereby perform every action that it is possible for me to take in
Agora, simultaneously.". I don't think there was a CFJ, but everyone
treated it as inval
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>Too subjective a precedent? Maybe. Discuss. -Goethe ]
Has generic and case-specific portions, which you've clearly labelled.
Good arrangement.
>When Agoran Rules allow an action to be conducted "by announcement",
>the specific announcement is the action in question, giving
[Long because I'm honored to finally weigh in on ISIDTID? Yes.
Too subjective a precedent? Maybe. Discuss. -Goethe ]
PSEUDO-JUDGEMENT 1774
First of all, Agora, by custom and practice, is based on actual
actions of individuals, not on purported actions by directed
avatars. Hence Kelly's Fa
10 matches
Mail list logo
