comex wrote: >By the way, although I'm not going to try to perl 10,000 CFJs, I see >no reason not to try to scam this before the loophole is closed (with >Proposal 5284 or such) with, say, 100.
Actually 100 has been done before, written out in full. Also, the voting period on P5284 will end before judge assignment is due. -zefram
