On Thursday 01 November 2007, Zefram wrote: > comex wrote: > >By the way, although I'm not going to try to perl 10,000 CFJs, I see > >no reason not to try to scam this before the loophole is closed (with > >Proposal 5284 or such) with, say, 100. > > Actually 100 has been done before, written out in full. Also, the > voting period on P5284 will end before judge assignment is due. > > -zefram
Troublesome.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
