Ivan Hope wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ivan Hope wrote:
>>
>>> Rule 2191: "An equity case regarding a pledge CAN be initiated by a
>>> non-party, provided that all other requirements for initiating an
>>> equity case are met. The initiator of s
ais523 wrote:
> Ah, I was wondering what you were trying to change there. (Incidentally,
> what happens in situations where the wrong parties are listed and so the
> wrong parties are informed, under the new rule?)
All informs have been sent to the PF, so no worries on that front.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Hope wrote:
>
>> Rule 2191: "An equity case regarding a pledge CAN be initiated by a
>> non-party, provided that all other requirements for initiating an
>> equity case are met. The initiator of such a case is considered
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 11:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Ivan Hope wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:02 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I call an equity case.
> >>>
> >>> Pledge: the above.
> >>> Parties: Sgeo an
Ivan Hope wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:02 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I call an equity case.
>>>
>>> Pledge: the above.
>>> Parties: Sgeo and me.
>>> State of affairs: Sgeo could stash all the currency I didn
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:22 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it can be argued that, although it's certainly possible to make
> a contract in a-d (I've made an Agoran contract over IRC before, for
> instance), the context of that particular pledge seems to show that it
> might not ne
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:22 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it can be argued that, although it's certainly possible to make
> a contract in a-d (I've made an Agoran contract over IRC before, for
> instance), the context of that particular pledge seems to show that it
> might not ne
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 22:36 -0400, ihope wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree to the following pledge
> > {
> > I pledge to, upon a player giving me eir entire supply of a currency,
> > give said player all of my supply of that currency, including w
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:24 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I call a CFJ on the following statement: "Sgeo is obligated to give
>> Ivan Hope CXXVII an amount of VP"
>>
>> Argument against:
>> The relevent pledge was clearl
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I call a CFJ on the following statement: "Sgeo is obligated to give
> Ivan Hope CXXVII an amount of VP"
>
> Argument against:
> The relevent pledge was clearly not intended to be binding, as it was
> sent to the discussion list, an
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:02 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I agree to the following pledge
>> {
>> I pledge to, upon a player giving me eir entire supply of a currency,
>> give said player all of my supply of that currenc
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:36 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree to the foll
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:36 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I agree to the following pledge
>>> {
>>> I pledge to, upon a player giving me eir entire su
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:36 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I agree to the following pledge
>> {
>> I pledge to, upon a player giving me eir entire supply of a currency,
>> give said player all of my supply of that curren
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following pledge
> {
> I pledge to, upon a player giving me eir entire supply of a currency,
> give said player all of my supply of that currency, including what
> that player gave me, as soon as possible.
> }
>
Me t
I agree to the following pledge
{
I pledge to, upon a player giving me eir entire supply of a currency,
give said player all of my supply of that currency, including what
that player gave me, as soon as possible.
}
16 matches
Mail list logo
