On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:36 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I agree to the following pledge
>>> {
>>> I pledge to, upon a player giving me eir entire supply of a currency,
>>> give said player all of my supply of that currency, including what
>>> that player gave me, as soon as possible.
>>> }
>>
>> Despite this being NTTPF, the rule says, "Contracts are binding
>> agreements governed by the rules. Any agreement made by one or more
>> persons with the intention that it be binding on them and governed by
>> the rules is a contract (unless it would automatically terminate as a
>> contract)." Saying that he agrees is obvious evidence that he agrees.
>>
>> Therefore, I give Sgeo all my VP.
>>
>> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>>
> I believe my marking it as a scam, as well as clearly and deliberately
> sending it to a-d with the intention that it looks like a-b, makes it
> clear that I never intended it to be binding onto myself.
>
Unfortunatly for you Sgeo, i think it is a pledge by a CFJ that I
can't find the number to at the moment.
