On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:24 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I call a CFJ on the following statement: "Sgeo is obligated to give >> Ivan Hope CXXVII an amount of VP" >> >> Argument against: >> The relevent pledge was clearly not intended to be binding, as it was >> sent to the discussion list, and marked as a scam, shortly after I >> made messages testing a trick to make messages to the discussion list >> look like messages to the business list. > > On the contrary: since you admit it was a scam, that means you were > intending for others to interpret it as an agreement. Intending for > others to interpret something as an agreement is exactly how you > "officially" agree to something in Agora. > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:02 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I call an equity case. >>> >>> Pledge: the above. >>> Parties: Sgeo and me. >>> State of affairs: Sgeo could stash all the currency I didn't give him, >>> then claim he only has to give back what he has after stashing. This >>> is clearly a great injustice. >> >> You aren't a party to that pledge. > > Rule 2191: "An equity case regarding a pledge CAN be initiated by a > non-party, provided that all other requirements for initiating an > equity case are met. The initiator of such a case is considered to be > a party to the pledge for the purpose of that case." >
Touche
