On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I call a CFJ on the following statement: "Sgeo is obligated to give > Ivan Hope CXXVII an amount of VP" > > Argument against: > The relevent pledge was clearly not intended to be binding, as it was > sent to the discussion list, and marked as a scam, shortly after I > made messages testing a trick to make messages to the discussion list > look like messages to the business list.
On the contrary: since you admit it was a scam, that means you were intending for others to interpret it as an agreement. Intending for others to interpret something as an agreement is exactly how you "officially" agree to something in Agora. On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:02 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I call an equity case. >> >> Pledge: the above. >> Parties: Sgeo and me. >> State of affairs: Sgeo could stash all the currency I didn't give him, >> then claim he only has to give back what he has after stashing. This >> is clearly a great injustice. > > You aren't a party to that pledge. Rule 2191: "An equity case regarding a pledge CAN be initiated by a non-party, provided that all other requirements for initiating an equity case are met. The initiator of such a case is considered to be a party to the pledge for the purpose of that case." --Ivan Hope CXXVII
