Goethe wrote:
> The confusion of case law finally reached the point that it was stated
> very explicitly in Rule 101/2 (Power=3) introduced by Maud, August 2005:
>
>Agora May I?
>
> Any player is permitted to perform an action which is not
> regulated. An action is regulated if
Wooble wrote:
> In any case, there appears to be precedent beyond just game custom
> that regulated actions are impossible to perform unless otherwise
> authorized by the rules, but unfortunately the CotC database stops 2
> cases later than the one I found cited (CFJ 1237), but CFJ 1295a does
> sa
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> In any case, there appears to be precedent beyond just game custom
> that regulated actions are impossible to perform unless otherwise
> authorized by the rules, but unfortunately the CotC database stops 2
> cases later than the one I found cited (CFJ 12
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal (AI=3,II=1):
> Amend rule 2125 by adding, at the end:
> "A player MAY NOT perform a regulated action except when permitted to
> do so by an instrument with power at least 0.1".
I think this
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
> I call for judgement on the statement "If a rule states that an action
> is regulated, that does not prevent that action from taking place, but
> only prevents that thing from taking place under rule 101(ii) (and
> therefore makes it impossible to take
5 matches
Mail list logo
