Indeed! By constraining both the length and the content, Yellow Cards create an
interesting creative challenge, too.
All in all, one of my favourite mechanics.
Cuddlebeam already has an outstanding Yellow Card, and eir voting strength is
zero for a few more days. I think I missed that in some r
I like coming up with interesting wordlists. They're fun to compile and
evidently the result is reasonably well-received, although I think o is the
only person whose been on the receiving end of my lists.
天火狐
On 14 July 2017 at 00:58, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2017, at 9:53 PM, Aris Merc
> On Jul 9, 2017, at 9:50 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> I would support, with a fair implementation.
>
> I point my finger at CB for failure to treat Agora Right Good Forever.
>
> I previously deregistered because I thought my explosive response to CB
> was my own issue, that e needed time to adjus
> On Jul 9, 2017, at 8:53 PM, CuddleBeam wrote:
>
> Via "An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. payed, given) by its owner
> to another entity by announcement", I announce that I transfer all assets to
> myself.
Absent a CFJ to the contrary, I see no way this can possibly work as evidentl
> On Jul 8, 2017, at 2:34 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> Fun fact: when an organization is transferred an Estate, it can never leave.
> rito plz.
Are you sure? Rule 2489 (“Estates”) purports to handle that case:
> A player may cause an Organization which owns an Estate to transfer that
> Estate to
On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 18:00 -0500, Nic Evans wrote:
> A compromise that I considered (and rejected just because the other is
> simpler): Have three pools: Nonjudges, Available Judges, Unavailable
> Judges. You can choose anyone from the Available Judges pool, which also
> makes the Unavailable. Whe
On 07/13/17 17:44, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:23 -0500, Nic Evans wrote:
>>> (I already have a good deal of text written for these, but wanted
>>> feedback on the abstracts before getting too committed.)
>>>
>>> Judicial Expansion
>>>
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:23 -0500, Nic Evans wrote:
> > (I already have a good deal of text written for these, but wanted
> > feedback on the abstracts before getting too committed.)
> >
> > Judicial Expansion
> > --
> >
> > Players opt-i
On 07/13/17 17:16, Alex Smith wrote:
> I currently try to pick appropriate judges for CFJs, while keeping
> things balanced. I'm not necessarily opposed to this change, but it'd
> likely lead to a more even distribution of cases to judges, which might
> or might not be seen as a good thing.
I have
On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:23 -0500, Nic Evans wrote:
> (I already have a good deal of text written for these, but wanted
> feedback on the abstracts before getting too committed.)
>
> Judicial Expansion
> --
>
> Players opt-in to the judge list. When a judge is needed, assign to th
(I already have a good deal of text written for these, but wanted
feedback on the abstracts before getting too committed.)
Judicial Expansion
--
Players opt-in to the judge list. When a judge is needed, assign to the
first on the list that isn't ineligible, then move them to the e
11 matches
Mail list logo
