I like coming up with interesting wordlists. They're fun to compile and evidently the result is reasonably well-received, although I think o is the only person whose been on the receiving end of my lists.
天火狐 On 14 July 2017 at 00:58, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > On Jul 9, 2017, at 9:53 PM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ > gmail.com> wrote: > > > I point my finger at CuddleBeam for violation of Rule 2471. I argue > > that air actions were so implausible that e could not reasonably have > > believed them, and that at the very least e is absurdly negligent. > > Given that this is having a huge impact on the players and the game > > (look at the deregistrations), I recommend a sentence of a Red Card. > > > I find this finger-pointing to be Shenanigans, based on the testimony of > the accused: > > > I wouldn't have written that wall of text if I didn't believe it had at > least a slither of chance of working. > > > Quite a number of scams in Agora’s past have relied on creative > interpretations of the rules, and while I personally believe there’s no way > this scam could work, I believe carding Cuddlebeam would unjustifiably > punish em for a bona fide attempt. > > Had I found otherwise, I would have issued a Yellow Card, not a Red Card. > In spite of the colour theme of the Cards, I find that a Yellow Card is > considerably more severe than a Red Card, especially if paired with a > challenging word list. It’s also easier to justify a Yellow Card in the > face of the accusations against Cuddlebeam in this finger-pointing. (This > is, perhaps, not working as intended.) > > Instead, I’ll reinforce ais523’s advice to find a co-conspirator for > future scams, and 天火狐’s observation that such tactics have very much worn > out their welcome. > > -o > >
