On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:23 -0500, Nic Evans wrote: > (I already have a good deal of text written for these, but wanted > feedback on the abstracts before getting too committed.) > > Judicial Expansion > ------------------ > > Players opt-in to the judge list. When a judge is needed, assign to the > first on the list that isn't ineligible, then move them to the end of > the list. If the proto below also passes, both CFJs and Criminal Cases > are assigned using the same list, keeping the workload for judges balanced.
I currently try to pick appropriate judges for CFJs, while keeping things balanced. I'm not necessarily opposed to this change, but it'd likely lead to a more even distribution of cases to judges, which might or might not be seen as a good thing. Note also that it effectively allows a CFJ caller to "choose their judge" via changing the timing of the CFJ. -- ais523
