On 07/13/17 17:16, Alex Smith wrote: > I currently try to pick appropriate judges for CFJs, while keeping > things balanced. I'm not necessarily opposed to this change, but it'd > likely lead to a more even distribution of cases to judges, which might > or might not be seen as a good thing.
I have no qualms with your system as it stands, but if we have two separate officers assigning judges, you either need coordination or something more formal. > Note also that it effectively > allows a CFJ caller to "choose their judge" via changing the timing of > the CFJ. Good to note, but not too worrisome since we have a robust appeals system.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
