Changing someone's name to "
I cause " doesn't deregister yourself.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I create a Slave Golem named Number Two.
>
> I announce that I will never cause Number Two to deregister.
>
> I cause Number Two to announce that e wants to deregister.
I announce that I want to deregister.
...But my R101 rights haven't been v
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Gratuitous: The first method being limited to the announcer is an
> inherent part of it, and similarly without-objection is an inherent
> part of the second. Past exceptions to this common-sense approach
> have depended on alternate constructi
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:21, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Evidence
>
> [Registrar's Report 1-Feb-2012 extract]
> > The Person Forme... 441...@gmail.com 13 Jan 12 *
> > [...]
> > * The Person Formally Known As
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:21, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Evidence
>
> [Registrar's Report 1-Feb-2012 extract]
> > The Person Forme... 441...@gmail.com 13 Jan 12 *
> > [...]
> > * The Person Formally Known As 441344
>
This was a mistake, acknowledged by me immediately after the message
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> > >> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
> > >
> > > COE: The text of R2130 is incorrect (and 1006 too).
> > >
> > > The ruleset (and o
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> >> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
> >
> > COE: The text of R2130 is incorrect (and 1006 too).
> >
> > The ruleset (and omd's rules website) seems to be missing some effects
> >
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
>> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
>
> COE: The text of R2130 is incorrect (and 1006 too).
>
> The ruleset (and omd's rules website) seems to be missing some effects
> of Proposal 6959 (30-Jan-2011, more recent than t
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Didn't this come up in another scam, that "otherwise impossible"
> includes things that are "regulated" as being "otherwise impossible to
> change" except as defined? I say "came up", I don't say I remember the
> decision!
http://zenith.homel
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> I cause Mr. Incredible to make each of the following players inactive:
Huh. I could have sworn I secured activity when I used it for a scam
last year.
> Arguments: Making ais523 inactive is an action that is "not otherwise
> IMPOSSIBLE"-- in particular, ais52
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > [It's often bothered me that R101 could be gotten around by redefining
> > "person" (for example via R2150).
>
> This is only a problem now that Rule 2150 is Power 3...
Well, if the "common dictionary" de
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> [It's often bothered me that R101 could be gotten around by redefining
> "person" (for example via R2150).
This is only a problem now that Rule 2150 is Power 3...
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I CFJ (linked) on:
> (1) The Prisoner is a player.
> Arguments: E never explicitly consented (R101iii).
>
> (2) The Prisoner's R101(vii) rights have been violated.
> Arguments: If e is a player, eir ability to deregister is
>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3165
>
> == CFJ 3165 ==
>
> omd is a complete idiot.
>
> ==
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Create a rule titled "Ballot Fees" with this text:
>
> A player CAN change eir voting limit on a specified Agoran
> decision to twice its original value for a cost of 1 ruble.
Does "original value" mean its value at the beginning of th
15 matches
Mail list logo
