On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > I CFJ (linked) on: > (1) The Prisoner is a player. > Arguments: E never explicitly consented (R101iii). > > (2) The Prisoner's R101(vii) rights have been violated. > Arguments: If e is a player, eir ability to deregister is > severly restricted.
so have Tweedledee and Tweedledum's, but I think the idea that a partnership's "desires" are what it says in the contract applies here - eir rights aren't being violated if e doesn't want to deregister.
