On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Didn't this come up in another scam, that "otherwise impossible" > includes things that are "regulated" as being "otherwise impossible to > change" except as defined? I say "came up", I don't say I remember the > decision!
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3063, but I'm arguing that the action is, in fact, already POSSIBLE in general.
