On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote: > I cause Mr. Incredible to make each of the following players inactive:
Huh. I could have sworn I secured activity when I used it for a scam last year. > Arguments: Making ais523 inactive is an action that is "not otherwise > IMPOSSIBLE"-- in particular, ais523 can do it by announcement, and any > player can do it without objection. Didn't this come up in another scam, that "otherwise impossible" includes things that are "regulated" as being "otherwise impossible to change" except as defined? I say "came up", I don't say I remember the decision! -G.
