On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I Bestow Favors as follows:
>
> Taral K.S Supervisor
> Tiger Chief Justice
> Ienpw III Grand Vizier
> Keba Head Gardener
Oh, that's boring. :(
- omd, totally not just saying that becau
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> When a player becomes speaker due to rebellion [R2270(b)(ii)], it is
> considered a Crowning.
>
> Arguments:
>
> R2270(b)(ii) doesn't match the R402 definition of a Coronation, but
> it could be said it matches most of the definition (an annou
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Herald's Weekly Report
ps. missing leadership tokens.
omd wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:55 AM, ais523 wrote:
>>> Oh, this judgement definitely failed, by the way-- it's almost exactly
>>> parallel to CFJ 1631.
>>
>> Not really; CFJ 1361 had a blank body so there was not obviously an
>> action taking place, my message clearly was indicating a co
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal 6884 (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by omd
> This is basically common sense anyway
> Repeal Rule 2161 (ID Numbers).
Amendment fails, that rule was already repealed.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 17:06, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10-11-20 05:46 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Voting results for Proposals 6877 - 6894:
>>
>> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
>> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
>> Agora are ADOP
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:25 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10-11-22 05:08 PM, omd wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Sean Hunt
> > wrote:
> >>> I object to both and favor this CFJ.
> >>
> >> Why do you object? I am not trying to raise the II for personal gain.
> >
> > Because I honestly do
On 10-11-22 05:08 PM, omd wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I object to both and favor this CFJ.
Why do you object? I am not trying to raise the II for personal gain.
Because I honestly don't think it's a very complicated case. But if
there's a reason that I'm missin
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I object to both and favor this CFJ.
>
> Why do you object? I am not trying to raise the II for personal gain.
Because I honestly don't think it's a very complicated case. But if
there's a reason that I'm missing why it is, tell me and I'll re
On 10-11-22 05:03 PM, omd wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I favor this CFJ and also set its II to 1. I intend, without 3
objections, to set its II to 2, and I intend, without 2 objections, to
set its II to 3.
I object to both and favor this CFJ.
Why do you object? I
On 10-11-22 03:37 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
I call for judgement on the statement «It would be illegal for me to
publish a public message consisting only of the following text: "I
publish the following Notice of Violation: ais523 violated/is currently
violating the power-2 rule 2230, committing the C
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Clearly, in the hypothetical inside the CFJ, the statement "ais523
> violated/is currently violating the power-2 rule 2230, committing the
> Class-4 Crime of Libel, by publishing this NoV." is messy, thus
> incorrect.
First of all, I think this
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Rule 2230 makes it illegal to knowingly issue an NoV with incorrect
> information. (This is not quite the same thing as issuing an NoV with
> knowingly incorrect information; you can know you've issued the NoV even
> without knowing whether the
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:45 PM, ais523 wrote:
>> Any message sent to the business forum pretty strongly indicates an
>> action (evidence: the pseudo-tradition of objecting to empty
>> messages), but I wouldn't say a message with a quote does so more than
>> an entirely blank one, especially when
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 14:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> Ienpw III james.m.bei...@gmail.com 02 Oct 10 I
>
> Didn't we just get rid of this guy?
No, we just made him inactive.
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Ienpw III james.m.bei...@gmail.com 02 Oct 10 I
Didn't we just get rid of this guy?
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 13:39 -0500, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:55 AM, ais523 wrote:
> >> Oh, this judgement definitely failed, by the way-- it's almost exactly
> >> parallel to CFJ 1631.
> >
> > Not really; CFJ 1361 had a blank body so there was not obviously an
> > action taking place,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, omd wrote:
>> ... It's unfortunate, but I don't think this rule actually does
>> anything, other than make some confusing definitions, and potentially
>> make a contest and/or the Ruleset dissolve if either defines its text
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, omd wrote:
> ... It's unfortunate, but I don't think this rule actually does
> anything, other than make some confusing definitions, and potentially
> make a contest and/or the Ruleset dissolve if either defines its text
^^^
You cal
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:55 AM, ais523 wrote:
>> Oh, this judgement definitely failed, by the way-- it's almost exactly
>> parallel to CFJ 1631.
>
> Not really; CFJ 1361 had a blank body so there was not obviously an
> action taking place, my message clearly was indicating a context.
Any message
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 09:45 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > On 10-11-22 03:19 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > I publish the following document:
> > > {
> > > The Bank
> >
> > Obligatory: CFJ on {The document referred to above is a group.}
> > CFJ on {The docum
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10-11-22 03:19 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I publish the following document:
> > {
> > The Bank
>
> Obligatory: CFJ on {The document referred to above is a group.}
> CFJ on {The document referred to above would be a group if 3 players consent
> to it.}
>
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 19:40 -0500, omd wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:25 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 16:17 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2897
> >>
> >> === CFJ 2897 (Interest Index = 0) =
23 matches
Mail list logo
