On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 13:39 -0500, omd wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:55 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> Oh, this judgement definitely failed, by the way-- it's almost exactly > >> parallel to CFJ 1631. > > > > Not really; CFJ 1361 had a blank body so there was not obviously an > > action taking place, my message clearly was indicating a context. > > Any message sent to the business forum pretty strongly indicates an > action (evidence: the pseudo-tradition of objecting to empty > messages), but I wouldn't say a message with a quote does so more than > an entirely blank one, especially when the entirely blank one is sent > by a non-player so that, like your message, there is only one sort of > action you would expect it to include.
There are plenty of things you might expect a non-player to do on an Agoran forum. (Bucky has done several of them.) -- ais523
