On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:55 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> Oh, this judgement definitely failed, by the way-- it's almost exactly >> parallel to CFJ 1631. > > Not really; CFJ 1361 had a blank body so there was not obviously an > action taking place, my message clearly was indicating a context.
Any message sent to the business forum pretty strongly indicates an action (evidence: the pseudo-tradition of objecting to empty messages), but I wouldn't say a message with a quote does so more than an entirely blank one, especially when the entirely blank one is sent by a non-player so that, like your message, there is only one sort of action you would expect it to include.
